PRD-STD-012: Inference Reliability & Cost Controls
Standard ID: PRD-STD-012
Version: 1.0
Status: Active
Compliance Level: Level 2 (Managed)
Effective Date: 2026-02-18
Last Reviewed: 2026-02-18
1. Purpose
This standard defines mandatory runtime controls for AI inference reliability and cost. It ensures AI-powered features can meet production service objectives while maintaining sustainable unit economics.
Without explicit reliability and cost controls, AI features can degrade user experience, trigger incident cascades, and erode business value through unmanaged inference spend.
2. Scope
This standard applies to:
- All production AI inference services and dependent runtime paths
- First-party, hosted, and third-party model inference integrations
- User-facing and operational AI features with defined SLO/SLA obligations
3. Definitions
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Inference SLO | Service-level objective for AI inference behavior (latency, availability, error rate) |
| Error Budget | Maximum acceptable SLO deviation in a defined period before action is required |
| Unit Cost | Cost per AI request, per session, or per 1,000 requests/tokens |
| Graceful Degradation | Controlled fallback behavior preserving core functionality under stress/failure |
| Traffic Guardrail | Runtime threshold that reduces, halts, or reroutes traffic when risk limits are breached |
4. Requirements
4.1 Service Objectives and Capacity Planning
REQ-012-01: Every production AI feature MUST define and publish inference SLOs for latency, availability, and error rate.
REQ-012-02: Teams MUST define error budgets and escalation triggers for each AI inference service.
REQ-012-03: Capacity planning MUST be validated pre-release through load and stress testing against expected peak traffic plus safety margin.
4.2 Runtime Resilience and Fallback
REQ-012-04: Inference paths MUST implement timeout, retry, and circuit-breaker controls aligned to SLO targets.
REQ-012-05: AI features MUST provide graceful degradation or fallback mode for upstream model/service failures.
REQ-012-06: Tier 2 and Tier 3 features MUST include tested rollback and traffic-shaping procedures.
4.3 Monitoring and Alerting
REQ-012-07: Production monitoring MUST include, at minimum:
- request volume and success/error rates
- latency percentiles (P50/P95/P99)
- timeout and retry rates
- fallback activation counts
- unit-cost telemetry
REQ-012-08: Critical inference alerts MUST route to on-call owners within 5 minutes.
REQ-012-09: Sustained SLO breaches MUST trigger automatic mitigation (traffic reduction, fallback, or rollback) according to documented runbooks.
4.4 Cost Governance and Efficiency
REQ-012-10: AI features MUST define unit-cost budgets and monthly spend thresholds with named accountable owners.
REQ-012-11: Material cost threshold breaches MUST trigger corrective action plans and executive visibility at the appropriate governance level.
REQ-012-12: Changes that materially increase inference cost or latency MUST require controlled rollout with comparative baseline measurement.
REQ-012-13: Organizations SHOULD maintain provider and model diversification strategies for high-criticality inference paths to reduce concentration risk.
5. Implementation Guidance
Minimum Reliability and Cost Control Stack
- SLO/error budget definitions per AI feature
- Runtime protection (timeouts, retries, circuit breakers, rate controls)
- Traffic policy (canary rollout, auto-halt, rollback)
- Fallback library (safe-mode behaviors by feature type)
- Unified observability dashboards for reliability and cost
- Monthly optimization review for latency/cost trends
Example Inference Gate Record
Inference Gate Decision: PASS | CONDITIONAL | FAIL
Feature: <name>
Version: <model/prompt/runtime>
SLO Baseline: <latency/availability/error targets>
Load Test Result: <pass/fail + peak evidence>
Fallback Readiness: <tested/unverified>
Cost Budget Impact: <within threshold / breach risk>
Approvers: <platform, product, engineering>
Date: <ISO 8601>
Minimum Operational Metrics
Track at least:
- p95 and p99 latency trend by critical route
- availability and error budget burn rate
- fallback activation rate and recovery time
- cost per 1,000 requests/tokens
- monthly spend vs. approved budget
6. Exceptions & Waiver Process
Waivers are permitted only for temporary non-critical procedural controls and MUST include expiration (maximum 30 days), compensating controls, and owner accountability.
No waivers are permitted for:
- missing SLO definitions for production AI features
- missing rollback/fallback readiness
- missing critical alert routing
- operating without cost visibility for production inference traffic
7. Related Standards
- PRD-STD-007: Performance & Quality Gates
- PRD-STD-010: AI Product Safety & Trust Controls
- Production Monitoring & Drift Management
- Model Incident Response & Recovery
- Financial Metrics
8. Revision History
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 2026-02-18 | AEEF Standards Committee | Initial release |